Show summary Hide summary
- What we now know about auditory hallucinations
- How the experiment turned inner speech into data
- From neural quirk to possible biomarker
- What remains uncertain in auditory hallucination research
- What this means for treatment, policy, and daily life
- How individuals can use this knowledge
- What exactly is a neural prediction error in inner speech?
- Does this study prove that inner speech causes auditory hallucinations?
- Can EEG tests now diagnose schizophrenia based on this finding?
- How could this research change treatment for people who hear voices?
- Are auditory hallucinations always a sign of schizophrenia?
What if the “voice” behind some auditory hallucinations is actually the brain listening to itself and getting confused? New research from UNSW Sydney suggests that a subtle neural quirk in how the brain predicts its own inner speech may be a key part of the mystery.
The work, led by Professor Thomas Whitford and published in Schizophrenia Bulletin, offers the strongest evidence so far that, in schizophrenia, the brain sometimes mislabels internal thoughts as external sounds. For people like “Lena”, a young architect trying to manage both her career and her mental health, this means a whispered comment in her mind can suddenly feel like an outside voice in the room.
What we now know about auditory hallucinations
The UNSW study suggests that auditory hallucinations may emerge when the brain’s normal prediction of its own inner voice is flipped. Instead of dampening activity in the auditory cortex, as happens in people without hallucinations, the brain of someone hearing voices shows a heightened response to inner speech that matches external sound.
Revolutionary Filtration Technology Promises Breakthrough in Eliminating PFAS
The Health Benefits of Singing, Dancing, and Immersing Yourself in Art
This pattern fits a long-standing theory in neuroscience and cognition: that many voice-hearing experiences in schizophrenia are a case of misattributed inner speech. Related work, such as a study on brain circuits behind hallucinations and efforts at MIT’s McGovern Institute to unpack auditory hallucinations, has been steadily pointing in the same direction.
The neural prediction glitch at the heart of the study
In one sentence, the team measured how the auditory cortex responds when people silently imagine sounds while hearing matching or mismatching sounds through headphones, using high-density EEG to track brainwaves in real time.
The research enrolled three groups: 55 people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who had experienced auditory verbal hallucinations in the previous week, 44 people with schizophrenia but no recent hallucinations, and 43 healthy participants with no history of psychosis. This design allowed the researchers to compare not just “schizophrenia versus healthy”, but also current voice-hearing versus no recent voices.
How the experiment turned inner speech into data
During the experiment, participants heard simple syllables such as “bah” or “bih” through headphones. At specific cues, they were asked to imagine saying one of these syllables silently in their heads, while EEG recorded the electrical activity across the scalp.
Crucially, participants did not know whether the imagined syllable would match the one they were about to hear. This allowed the team to test the brain’s prediction system: does the auditory cortex show the expected dampening when inner speech and external sound line up?
What healthy brains did versus brains hearing voices
In healthy volunteers, when imagined and heard syllables matched, activity in the auditory cortex decreased. This “suppression” effect matches earlier work, including analyses of brain signals in people without hallucinations, and is consistent with other findings reported in outlets such as ScienceAlert on brain signal disruptions.
In participants who had experienced recent auditory verbal hallucinations, the pattern was reversed. When the inner and outer syllables matched, their brains showed a stronger response, as if an external voice had become more salient. Those with schizophrenia but no recent hallucinations fell in between these two patterns, suggesting a spectrum of prediction accuracy.
From neural quirk to possible biomarker
This inversion of the normal prediction effect is the study’s key finding. It indicates that, during active hallucinations, the brain’s internal model of self-generated sound might be miscalibrated. Inner speech then becomes tagged as “not me”, which can change a passing thought into a convincing voice.
The consistency of this effect across the 55 hallucinating participants gives the team cautious optimism that this EEG pattern could function as a candidate biomarker for psychosis risk. Similar ambitions are visible in other lines of work, such as the neuroimaging literature on the experience of auditory hallucinations and integrative approaches like mapping minds through neurophenomenology.
Why this matters for diagnosis and early intervention
Current diagnosis of schizophrenia still relies mainly on interviews and observed behaviour. There is no routine blood test or scan that can reliably identify the condition. A reliable neural marker related to perception and inner speech would change how early detection is approached.
If replicated and refined, this EEG signature could help clinicians flag individuals whose brains show a vulnerability in differentiating self-generated from external sound. For someone like Lena, that might mean targeted monitoring and support well before the first distressing hallucinations appear.
What remains uncertain in auditory hallucination research
Despite the clarity of the pattern, the study does not prove that this neural quirk causes auditory hallucinations. The association is strong, but the direction of causality is not fully established. Hallucinations might reshape brain prediction systems, or a third factor could influence both.
The participants all had schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses, so results may not generalize to people who hear voices in other contexts, such as mood disorders or after trauma. Other research, including the theory-driven work on how the brain hears voices that are not really there, suggests that multiple pathways to voice-hearing likely exist.
Limits of the method and future directions
EEG has excellent timing resolution but relatively coarse spatial precision, so the precise locations of the disrupted circuits remain partly unresolved. Combining EEG with fMRI and computational models, as seen in studies catalogued on ScienceDirect’s reports on auditory processing, will be needed to refine the circuitry involved.
Another limitation is that the task uses very simple syllables. Real-life hallucinations are often complex, emotional, and context-dependent. Future experiments will need to step closer to naturalistic language and to integrate subjective reports, as encouraged by broader approaches in recent mechanistic accounts of hallucinations.
What this means for treatment, policy, and daily life
For treatment, these findings strengthen the case for therapies that work directly with inner speech. Techniques in cognitive behavioural therapy that help people label and reframe their internal dialogue may gain additional scientific backing from this kind of cognition-focused neuroscience.
On the policy side, if EEG-based markers become reliable, mental health systems might one day screen at-risk groups more proactively, much like cardiology uses stress tests for heart disease. Early recognition of this neural prediction glitch could support interventions before hallucinations become debilitating.
How individuals can use this knowledge
For people who already experience voices, understanding that these may arise from a misprediction in the brain can be relieving. The experience is no less real, but it is less mysterious and less blame-inducing. The “neural quirk” becomes something understandable, not a personal failing.
Families and carers can also benefit. Instead of dismissing hallucinations as “imagined”, they can appreciate that perception itself has been altered. This perspective aligns with ongoing brain scan research into what happens when a person with schizophrenia hears voices, reinforcing that these are genuine perceptual events shaped by biology and experience.
- Inner speech is a normal mental process, but its prediction can be disrupted.
- Auditory cortex responses reveal how the brain tags sounds as “self” or “other”.
- EEG patterns may one day assist in predicting psychosis risk.
- Therapeutic strategies that target inner dialogue gain scientific support.
- Public understanding of hallucinations can shift from blame to biology.
What exactly is a neural prediction error in inner speech?
A neural prediction error occurs when the brain’s expectation about a sensory event does not match what is actually processed. In inner speech, the brain normally predicts the sound of one’s own voice and dampens auditory cortex activity. When this dampening fails or reverses, the mismatch creates a prediction error that may cause self-generated thoughts to feel as if they come from an external source.
Does this study prove that inner speech causes auditory hallucinations?
The study provides strong support for a link between disrupted prediction of inner speech and auditory hallucinations, but it does not prove direct causation. The data show that people with recent hallucinations have inverted brain responses to imagined sounds. However, researchers still need longitudinal and experimental studies to determine whether this change precedes hallucinations, results from them, or interacts with other biological and psychological factors.
Can EEG tests now diagnose schizophrenia based on this finding?
At present, EEG tests based on this effect are not ready for clinical diagnosis. The pattern identified in the study is promising as a candidate biomarker, but it requires replication, standardisation, and validation across diverse populations. Diagnostic tools must also distinguish schizophrenia from other conditions that may share similar brain signatures. For now, the technique is a research method rather than a clinical test.
How could this research change treatment for people who hear voices?
How Rare Australian Rocks Trace the Birth of a Vital Metal
Bone Cancer Treatment Surprisingly Reduces Tumor Pain
The results support approaches that work directly with inner speech and self-monitoring. Therapies might focus more on helping people recognise and label their internal dialogue, reduce anxiety around voices, and adjust attention to predicted versus unexpected sounds. Future pharmacological treatments could also target neural circuits involved in sensory prediction. However, any new intervention will need rigorous clinical trials before being widely adopted.
Are auditory hallucinations always a sign of schizophrenia?
No, auditory hallucinations can occur in multiple contexts, including mood disorders, trauma-related conditions, neurological illnesses, or even in some people without a diagnosable disorder. The UNSW findings specifically concern individuals with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and recent hallucinations. While similar mechanisms may appear in other groups, each clinical context has its own risk factors and must be evaluated by qualified mental health professionals.
